Cases 1 - 10 of 49
BRUNNER v. GILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BRUNNER
Defendant:
ALYSSA GILSON and KRISTIN MCHENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCHENRY v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01497
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCHENRY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GRIFFEY v. ALLEN et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
ROMAN GRIFFEY
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRYAN ALLEN, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WILLIAMSON, SGT. MATTHEW KUMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HINDMAN et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01873
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HINDMAN, ANGIE HINDMAN and BRIANNA HOLLAND
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSLYVANIA, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, MICHELLE MCHENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCHENRY v. THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MCHENRY
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Ledebur et al v. MCHENRY III et al
as 2:2021cv00705
Defendant:
BE THE BANK INVESTMENTS, MAC BUSINESS SERVICES, ARTHUR S. MCHENRY and others
Plaintiff:
PE&L Investments LLC and Paul Ledebur
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NUNEZ RAMIREZ v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv05593
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR, JAMES R. MCHENRY, CHAIRMAN DAVID H. WETMORE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK NUNEZ RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00685
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SZUKICS v. MCHENRY, ET AL
as 1:2019cv00379
Defendant:
SCI ALBION STAFF, DEPUTY PAUL ENNIS, JERI SMOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN JOSEPH SZUKICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
