Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
GRASMEDER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04511
Plaintiff:
Michael James Grasmeder
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
MARSHALL v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES MARSHALL
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Michael French v. Warden Rockview
as 22-1363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES FRENCH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ROCKVIEW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
HELLER v. OPTIMAL ACUITY CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv20371
Plaintiff:
DONALD HELLER
Defendant:
OPTIMAL ACUITY CORPORATION, MICHAEL JAMES BERRY I and MICHAEL JAMES BERRY II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Northumberland County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael James Robinson
Defendant:
Northumberland County Jail, Lt. Joe Shurock and Sgt. Bart Shuman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRENCH v. SALAMON
as 3:2021cv00097
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES FRENCH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (JOSH SHAPIRO) and SUPERINTENDENT BOBBI JO SALAMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
