Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mahmoud Ibrahim v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1962
Petitioner:
MAHMOUD MOHAMED AHMED IBRAHIM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carey v. Mt. Airy Casino and Resort et al
as 3:2019cv01351
Defendant:
Robert O'Hara, Cpl. Thomas C. Keegan, Amanda Lou Pedhegon and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jackson Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BEHERNS et al v. ARCONIC, INC.
as 2:2019cv02664
Plaintiff:
ALK HAXHISEFA, PAULOS TEKLE, HANIFE MACIT and others
Defendant:
ARCONIC, INC., ALCOA INC, SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02997
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
AHMED v. CHASE BANK, et al.
as 3:2010cv06770
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED AHMED
Defendant:
CHASE BANK, et al.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AHMED v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69554
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED AHMED
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. REYES GROCERY INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05893
Plaintiff:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.
Defendant:
REYES GROCERY INC., MOHAMMED AHMED and DOES ONE through TEN, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
LANDERS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2008cv04636
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LANDERS and BONNIE LANDERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER PHILADELPHIA, PA, SANTIAGO FIGUEREO-BERLANGA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. EZ DONUTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02332
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC and DD IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant:
EZ DONUTS, INC., MOHAMED A. MOHAMED, MAHMOUD MOHAMED AHMED WANAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
