Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MOTTO et al v. NEWELL BRANDS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MOTTO and JILL MOTTO
Defendant:
NEWELL BRANDS INC. and THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOTTO v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01551
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNA MOTTO
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Petitioner:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, JOSHUA D. LAMANCUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOTTO FRANCHISING, LLC v. MCCABE et al
as 2:2021mc00056
Plaintiff:
MOTTO FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCABE and GREATER PHILADELPHIA AREA MORTGAGE, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Keith Burley, Jr. v. Joshua Lamancusa, et al
as 21-1342
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL VOGLER, DOMINICK MOTTO, MORGAN BOYD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
BURLEY v. LAMANCUSA et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Defendant:
LORETTA SPIELVOGEL, MORGAN BOYD, QUAHLIERO PERRY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MOTTO et al v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2013cv00787
Plaintiff:
DONNA MOTTO and VINCENT MOTTO
Defendant:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
