Cases 1 - 10 of 82
ROSARIO v. LOVERA et al
as 5:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
JOVAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
JERAMY LOVERA, OFFICER BEST, SARGENT NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dickson v. Washabaugh et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
JAMES E. DICKSON
Respondent:
J. WASHABAUGH, LT. FOSTER, C/O SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Washabaugh et al
as 1:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
James E. Dickson
Defendant:
J. Washabaugh, Lt. Foster, C.O. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Futrell v. Sones et al
as 1:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Jule C. Futrell
Defendant:
Mr. (First Name Unknown) Sones, Mr. (First Name Unknown) Maroney, Ms. Melissa Swaboski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
ROUX v. EARLYWHINE et al
as 2:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
ERIK ROUX
Defendant:
R. EARLYWHINE, [FIRST NAME UNKNOWN] KACHOU, [FIRST NAMEUNKNOWN] GLOADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FEDD v. POWELL et al
as 2:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
ROSYLEN FEDD
Defendant:
NICHOLAS POWELL and FIRST NAME UNKNOWN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
