Cases 1 - 10 of 12
THOMAS v. NASA et al
as 1:2023cv09464
Plaintiff:
AUDREY THOMAS
Defendant:
NASA and COOPER HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NASA MACHINE TOOLS, INC. v. FAMA Technology Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02872
Plaintiff:
NASA MACHINE TOOLS, INC.
Defendant:
FAMA Technology Inc. , Procut Technologies, LLC and Farzad Ahmadpour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BONNER v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01168
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
CIA, NSA, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mary Mathis v. Homeland Security, et al
as 12-1496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY A. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US FEDERAL COURTS and others
Mary Mathis v. City of Erie Police Department, et al
as 12-1509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY A. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ERIE TASK FORCE, ERIE CTY SHERIFF and others
MARSH-MATHIS v. HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
MARY A, MARSH-MATHIS
Defendant:
HOMELAND SECURITY, USA STATES-PENNSYLVANIA, U.S. FEDERAL GOVT-COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNETTE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv30398
Plaintiff:
NASA F JENNETTE, JR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
