Cases 1 - 10 of 162
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
ALPHEAUS SMITH
Defendant:
SAMANTHA THOMPSON and NOAH SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAST CHANCE RANCH v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
LAST CHANCE RANCH
Defendant:
LOREN J. MCCUTCHEON and NOAH'S ARK EDUCATIONAL ZOO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Skrip et al v. Tulpehocken Spring Water, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Joseph Skrip and Noah Peznowski
Defendant:
Tulpehocken Spring Water, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
REMARK et al v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
JACLYN REMARK and NOAH BIRKETT
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a XFINITY and CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frank Giordano, et al v. Andrews Hohns, et al
as 24-1305
Plaintiff:
FRANK GIORDANO and DANIEL M. DILELLA
Defendant:
ANDREWS HOHNS, NOAH GRIFFIN, JAMES SWANSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Orozco v. Stairs et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Noah Orozco
Defendant:
Janice Stairs, Karl Hanneman, David Peat and others
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J. Noah, B.V. v. Maxwell et al
as 1:2023mc00529
Plaintiff:
J. Noah, B.V.
Defendant:
Willie J. Maxwell, II doing business as Zoo Gang Touring and Zoo Gang Music, LLC doing business as Zoo Gang Touring
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
