Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PINCKNEY v. OCONNOR
as 3:2023cv22563
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
OCONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPRATLEY v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv04586
Plaintiff:
TOUSIANT F. SPRATLEY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, TPR. T.J. ANDERSON (#7961), TPR. S.M. BECK (#7827) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLETCHER et al v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01361
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY PLETCHER, JOSIAH KOSTEK, NICHOLAS CONLEY and others
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE, INC. and C&J GROCERY CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
OCONNOR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv17275
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ILENE OCONNOR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Golf Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03990
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee and Raven E Lee
Defendant:
Golf Transportation, Inc., O'Connor Trucking, Inc., OCONNOR TRUCKING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bastone v. Leskowski et al
as 3:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Myra Bastone
Defendant:
OConnor Trucking, Inc., Greg Leskowski and JP Logistics, Inc.
Interpleader:
Anderson Bastone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OCONNOR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANIEL OCONNOR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woods v. Grant et al
as 1:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
Bernard F Woods
Defendant:
Brian Grant, Mark Grajewski and Terry Oconnor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OCONNOR et al v. GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv04388
Plaintiff:
MARY JANE OCONNOR and JAMES OCONNOR
Defendant:
GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
