Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SCOTT v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2020cv10499
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SCOTT
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv09258
Plaintiff:
Brenda Freeman , Cynthia Acker , Mary Acosta and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , Janssen Ortho LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donielle Hoist v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 15-3038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONIELLE T. HOIST
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, DEBRA EWALT and others
SCOTT v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04907
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SCOTT
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATTS et al V. A.C.AND S.INC.,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66354
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE MARY WARDEN, STEVEN BARNES, JOSEPH LEE BARNES and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
In re: Clinton C. Barlow
as 09-2673
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CLINTON C. BARLOW
Defendant - Respondent:
STATE OF NJ, NJ DEPT HUMAN SER, DEBORAH GOMEZ and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
GARRETT E BROWN, JR.
Altland et al v. York County Transportation Authority
as 1:2007cv01431
Plaintiff:
Laurie D. Altland, Laurie D. Altland, Diedra Y. Bare and others
Defendant:
York County Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
