Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICAHEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDUJAR v. B&I AUTO SUPPLY, INC et al
as 2:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANDUJAR
Defendant:
B&I AUTO SUPPLY, INC and JAMES PLUCK
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
NIBLACK v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2016cv00509
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY , UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Laurensau v. Charles Pluck, et al
as 13-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PLUCK, CO I, RONALD YOURKIN, LYLE POZIVIAK, CO I and others
Joseph Laurensau v. Louis Folino
as 13-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
CRAIG HAYWOOD, FRANK, J. MATTHEWS and others
Daniel Delker v. Blaker, et al
as 12-2712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DELKER
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKER, CHARLES PLUCK, KING and others
LAURENSAU v. PLUCK et al
as 2:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant:
CHARLES PLUCK, YOURKINS, LYLE POZIVIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAURENSAU v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, CRAIG HAYWOOD, MR. FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DELKER v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER ("CO") BLAKER et al
as 2:2009cv00710
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DELKER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER ("CO") BLAKER, PLUCK, ESPEROKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
