Cases 1 - 10 of 15
OLLIE v. LUBAHN, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. OLLIE
Defendant:
JOHN LUBAHN, M.D., JOHN DOE, HAMOT MEDICAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. DuPree et al
as 1:2016cv01173
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
N DuPree, Figeroa, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Patrick Smith, Franchot Wallace, Matthew Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Bristol-Myers Squib Company et al
as 3:2014cv04260
Plaintiff:
Dolly Sanders , Sandra Cheatham , Ruth Bridges and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIB COMPANY , SANOFI-SYNTHELABO INC. , MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRASIER-SMITH et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2013cv01492
Plaintiff:
SANDRA K. FRASIER-SMITH and PATRICK SMITH
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Kenneth Abraham v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-3864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH R. ABRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, PHELPS, Warden, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Abraham v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Abraham
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2010cv07334
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP MCCOY
Defendant:
FRANK A. MARTIN, WM. FARRELL, PATRICK SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
