Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Frederick Foster v. Joel Slomsky, et al
as 23-1298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CHRISTOPHER A. LEWIS, JONATHAN S. GOLDMAN and others
Frederick Foster v. Joel Slomsky, et al
as 22-3105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CHRISTOPHER A. LEWIS, JONATHAN S. GOLDMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
PITNEY BOWES INC. v. ITS MAILING SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05024
Plaintiff:
PITNEY BOWES INC.
Defendant:
ITS MAILING SYSTEMS, INC., GARY P. SHANK, MARTIN R. KLAGHOLZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Hirey Realty Corporation
as 1:2009mc00134
Movant:
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Respondent:
Hirey Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Whisper Capital LLC
as 1:2009mc00135
Movant:
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Respondent:
Whisper Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
Uship Intellectual Properties LLC v. Pitney Bowes Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Uship Intellectual Properties LLC
Defendant:
Pitney Bowes Inc. and NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TYSON v. PITNEY BOWES LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
as 2:2007cv03105
Plaintiff:
BRIAN F. TYSON
Defendant:
PITNEY BOWES LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, PITNEY BOWES PENSION PLAN, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF PITNEY BOWES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
