Cases 1 - 10 of 66
R.M. et al v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2024cv04379
Plaintiff:
R.M. and GALIT CHAIT-MORACCI
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, ABC COMPANY 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice for Removal - Product Liability
L.C.N. et al v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
L.C.N., L.D.C., N.N.M. and others
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Gerber Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO v. UGI UTILITIES INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03008
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO
Defendant:
UGI UTILITIES INC. and R.M. PALMER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO v. UGI UTILITIES INC. et al
as 5:2023cv03008
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO
Defendant:
UGI UTILITIES INC. and R.M. PALMER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Williams v. Wolfe
as 2:2023cv00789
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
R.M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC v. R.M. PALMER CO.
as 5:2022cv03716
Plaintiff:
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC
Defendant:
R.M. PALMER CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC v. R.M. PALMER CO.
as 2:2022cv03716
Plaintiff:
FRANKFORD CANDY LLC
Defendant:
R.M. PALMER CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
