Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GONDOR v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2019cv05428
Defendant:
RYAN BENNER, MICHAEL MURPHY, UNKNOWN SUPERVISER OF ROBERT BENNET - UDPD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. GONDOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2019cv05047
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Alan Bennett, Jr. v. Commonwealth Pennsylvania Supe, et al
as 16-3119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN ROBERT BENNETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY SNYDER COUNTY
Bennett v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2014cv01837
Petitioner:
Alan Robert Bennett, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENNETT v. ALLIANCEONE INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2014cv02353
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BENNETT
Defendant:
ALLIANCEONE INCORPORATED and ALLIANCEONE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BENNETT et al v. GREAT LAKES CHEESE CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv06387
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BENNETT, ROBERT BENNETT, CYNTHIA HUTCHINSON and others
Defendant:
GREAT LAKES CHEESE CO., INC. and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LEHNER et al v. MATHEWS et al
as 1:2008cv05420
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEHNER, JUSTINE LEHNER, TYLER LEHNER and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH MATHEWS, TOWNSHIP OF MAPLE SHADE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL MASTRANGELO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ADAMS et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
as 2:2007cv67447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ADAMS, STANLEY AGACHINSKI, MARIO AGNES and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELEC CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BENNETT v. NORFOLK AND SOUTHERN RAILROAD et al
as 2:2007cv63084
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BENNETT
Defendant:
NORFOLK AND SOUTHERN RAILROAD, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
