Cases 1 - 7 of 7
WHITE v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05227
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. WHITE
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUMMA et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05861
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA J. SUMMA , PAUL SYKES , JOHN L. TANGO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE, et al. v. I.E.'S, LLC
as 3:2012cv07532
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. WHITE and GAIL J. GEIGER
Defendant:
I.E.'S, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
William Ansell v. Ross Twp, et al
as 10-1402
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM ANSELL
Defendant - Non-Participating:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, RAMON RUSTIN, PETER M CHUBERKO, individually and in his official apacity of a Ross Township Police Officer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1-10, inclusive
Defendant - Appellant:
VINCENT LONGO, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy for the Allegheny County Sheriff's Department, RONALD STOKES, individually and in his official capacity as a deoputy for the Allegheny County Sherrif's Department, JAMES STEGENA, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy for the Alleghent County Sherriff's Department and others
ANSELL v. ROSS TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2009cv01398
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANSELL
Defendant:
ROSS TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, MATTHEW E. GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62262
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WHITE and RICHARD E. WHITE
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER CORP., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WHITE v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61187
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. WHITE, RICHARD R. WHITE, RICHARD R. WHITE and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
