Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DIXON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv02912
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TWANA S. DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Dixon v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv01744
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Dixon and Lois J. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DIXON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43299
Plaintiff:
FELTON S. DIXON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DIXON v. A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 2:2008cv78977
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. DIXON, JAMES S. DIXON and JAMES S. DIXON
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dixon v. Phelps et al
as 1:2008cv00152
Petitioner:
Jamie S. Dixon
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Delaware Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HINTON v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
COREY HINTON
Defendant:
FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, EVANS GARY, JR., RICHARD BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
Thomas Carroll, David Pierce, David Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66365
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J. ADAMS, ROSIE ADAMS, CHARLES ALLARD and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
