Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06572
Plaintiff:
SHARON REGINA SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv08816
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
SHARON E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Sharon Michele Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sharon Smith v. Commissioner Social Security
as 19-3681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON MARIE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09892
Plaintiff:
SHARON A. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv01822
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PATEL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2011cv06650
Plaintiff:
HIREN PATEL
Defendant:
SHARON K. SMITH and NICOLE JOHNSON
Counter_claimant:
SHARON K. SMITH and NICOLE JOHNSON
Counter_defendant:
HIREN PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATEL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2010cv04165
Plaintiff:
HIREN PATEL
Defendant:
SHARON K. SMITH, NICOLE JOHNSON and SJ SUBS LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MADISON v. FAIRMOUNT COMMUNITY HEALTH et al
as 2:2010cv01292
Plaintiff:
YVETTE MADISON
Defendant:
FAIRMOUNT COMMUNITY HEALTH and SHARON MOORE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 2:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
SHARON E. SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
