Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HAMMER v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HAMMER AS ASSIGNEE OF MICHAEL RUPNICKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MR. TREE AND DANIEL J. SHAUGHNESSY, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DEVIN WADE SHAUGHNESSY
Defendant:
WESTERN WORLD and AIG INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv06958
Plaintiff:
DONALD A ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BILLY GREEN, JUAN SHAUGHNESSY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPAULDING v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2021cv04009
Plaintiff:
SPAULDING LESLIE and LESLIE SPAULDING
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, Robert Shaughnessy, PO WALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BROOKS v. GILLEN et al
as 2:2017cv02672
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
BRIAN GILLEN, RODNEY WALLMESSAM, LEN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. O'Shaughnessy
as 1:2014cv01268
Petitioner:
Darrell Parks
Respondent:
M. O'Shaughnessy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. SHAUGHNESSY AND SONS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
as 2:2014cv03974
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
SHAUGHNESSY AND SONS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05890
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
