Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Henry v. Spicer et al
as 1:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Nelson T. Henry
Defendant:
David Spicer, Logan Spicer, City of Dover Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Coulbourne et al
as 1:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nelson T. Henry
Defendant:
Corporal Joshua Tate Coulbourne, Corporal Michael Kealty and Patrolman Dylan Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENRY et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv11706
Plaintiff:
NELMA L. HENRY and EDWIN T HENRY
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02179
Plaintiff:
JOHN J LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SETH WILLIAMS, MATHEW WHITE D.A.'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Bickell et al
as 3:2014cv01792
Plaintiff:
Rodney Anderson
Defendant:
T. Bickell, J. Ditty, T. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hankins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv01557
Plaintiff:
Robert Hankins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Harry, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BELL
Defendant:
GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Jamison
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Steven R. Glunt, Jeffrey Ditty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
Gerald Drummond and Michael Burkhart
Defendant:
Laurel R. Harry, J. Meintel, T. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
