Cases 1 - 10 of 33
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RODRIGUEZ v. HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY et al
as 2:2023cv13524
Plaintiff:
William Rodriguez
Defendant:
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY, BRIAN T. KELLY, Struan Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JENNINGS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
WAYNE JENNINGS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN DOE PROSECUTOR and JUDGE JOHN T. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Tony Burton
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Kathy Brittain, Faith Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles et al v. Kelly
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Peter Charles and Nicole Charles
Defendant:
John T Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHARLES et al v. KELLY
as 2:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
PETER CHARLES and NICOLE CHARLES
Defendant:
JOHN T KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kelly et. al. v. Johnson & Johnson et. al.
as 3:2019cv18788
Plaintiff:
William T. Kelly and Elissa Kelly
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYKINS v. PINHO et al
as 2:2015cv06295
Plaintiff:
PERRY BOYKINS
Defendant:
PINHO, DELA PRIDA, T. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAZ v. HUGHES et al
as 2:2015cv01846
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS PAZ
Defendant:
RENEE CARDWELL HUGHES and DENNIS T. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rambert v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Eric X. Rambert
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Andrew Filkosky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
