Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,653
TAYLOR v. EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a HEARTLAND ECSI
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff: ALEXYS TAYLOR
Defendant: EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a HEARTLAND ECSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Brown et al v. Paris
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff: Taylor Brown, Shawn Palmer, Max Ness and others
Defendant: Col. Christopher Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SHENK v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 2:2024cv02458
Defendant: AMY L. GRIFFITHS, AMY L. SHENK, JANE & JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff: CRAIG SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. CO 1 DUNSTON et al
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff: WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant: CO 1 DUNSTON and THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ANDERSON et al v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2024cv02181
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ANDERSON, STANLEY BATTLE, JR., ALONDA BORDLEY and others
Defendant: VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BOYD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00631
Plaintiff: Cameron Taylor Boyd
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Boyd v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff: Cameron Taylor Boyd
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?