Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walker v. Brittain et al
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Terry Walker
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, Jill Marhelko and Donald Newberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Walker v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 20-2964
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY WALKER
BRYANT v. HARPER et al
as 2:2020cv01051
Defendant:
RN WILLIAMS, JANE DOES, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
MARLYNN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WALKER v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2018cv03705
Petitioner:
TERRY WALKER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KATHY BRITTAIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terry Walker v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 16-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT
WALKER v. THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2015cv03632
Plaintiff:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, THE COUNTY OF SALEM, THE SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN/ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Walker v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, Supt. Asst./Grievance Coordinator, SCI Houtzdale, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DIEHL and others
WALKER v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DIEHL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73698
Plaintiff:
TERRY WALKER, TERRY WALKER, TERRY WALKER and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
