Cases 1 - 10 of 23
TOOMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01805
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOOMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
CRITCHLEY, KINUM, & DENOIA, LLC v. TOOMER
as 2:2020cv04834
Plaintiff:
CRITCHLEY, KINUM, & DENOIA, LLC
Defendant:
DONALD S. TOOMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv02917
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL, DONNA MITCHELL, PEARL TOOMER and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOOMER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv02309
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Plaintiff:
FELICIA TOOMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delroy Toomer v. Attorney General United States
as 19-2942
Petitioner:
DELROY RICARDO TOOMER, AKA Rick Toomer
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00740
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Terian Toomer
as 17-2077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERIAN TOOMER
TOOMER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
TANIEA TOOMER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOOMER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08781
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. TOOMER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
