Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tyrone DavisIn re: Tyrone Davis
as 21-2001
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
In re: TYRONE DAVIS
DAVIS v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE
as 2:2018cv05095
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DAVIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. INTERSTATE GENERAL MEDIA et al
as 2:2014cv06950
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. JONES
Defendant:
INTERSTATE GENERAL MEDIA, GOOGLE CORPORATION, TYRONE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton et al v. Religious Accommodation Committee et al
as 3:2013cv02680
Plaintiff:
Derek Clifton, Leonards Quattlebaum, Eric Maple and others
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E. Wetzel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00893
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRENT v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2012cv05694
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRENT
Defendant:
TYRONE DAVIS, DANIEL BROOKS and NEFFATRIA WAGSTAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2012cv05646
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE OR JANE DOE and UNKNOWN KITCHEN OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KARRAS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01916
Plaintiff:
ALEX KARRAS , SUSAN CLARK , HENRY LOUIS ADAMS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: LeRoy Shelley
as 11-4422
Petitioner:
In re: LEROY SHELLEY, AKA Tyron Davis
Respondent:
ATTY GEN DE
PRATER et al v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv06962
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER and (MINOR CHILD) PRATER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, TAXI AND LEMO, OLD CITY CAB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
