Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LEE v. JANOSKO et al
as 2:2018cv01297
Defendant:
CAPTAIN F. SALVAY, TROOPER BOARDMAN, FBI SPECIAL AGENT RARPAIN and others
Plaintiff:
DONOVON LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith et al v. Garrnett et al
as 1:2016cv02236
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith, William V. Smith and Michael L. Smith
Defendant:
Tracy Garrnett, Greg Palese, Shirley Sowzioral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01204
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GARRETT BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, J. TREMPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2014cv01608
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Marie Smith, William V. Smith and Michael L. Smith
Defendant:
Probation and Parole and Dauphin County Court Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
as 5:2011cv54072
Plaintiff:
CUTHBERT V. SMITH
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66940
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE G. SMITH and CLIFFORD V. SMITH JR.
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34217
Plaintiff:
THOMAS V. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66622
Plaintiff:
JEROME V. SMITH
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv03090
Plaintiff:
RENY MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THEO V. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2008cv89658
Plaintiff:
DOTY V. SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., CAREY CANADA, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
