Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CG Technology Development, LLC v. William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00533
Defendant:
William Hill PLC, Brandywine Bookmaking LLC and William Hill U.S. Holdco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CG Technology Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hill et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
Sarah A. Hill and William Hill
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Powell
as 1:2013cv01766
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Defendant:
Carol Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2011cv01113
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HILL
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35315
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HILL and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL et al v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93287
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM HILL and MILDRED DILLON HILL
Defendant:
FLUOR DANIEL, INC. , FLUOR DANIEL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HILL et al v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.
as 2:2009mc00170
Plaintiff:
JANELLE HILL and WILLIAM HILL
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion for Enforcement
HILL v. RUSTIN et al
as 2:2009cv00142
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HILL
Respondent:
RAMON RUSTIN and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HILL v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2008cv05476
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HILL
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
