Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv06920
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L SMITH and ESTATE OF CHERYL A. RENNIE-SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Smith v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-2982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Smith v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
SMITH v. CAMERON et al
as 1:2015cv00787
Petitioner:
William L. Smith
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00102
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41724
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34137
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72627
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. SMITH
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
