Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Deon, Sr. v. Barasch et al
as 1:2017cv01454
Plaintiff:
Pasquale T. Deon, Sr.
Defendant:
David M. Barasch, Kevin F. O'Toole, Richard G. Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2014cv04231
Plaintiff:
TRACY WHITAKER
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , COUNTY OF DELAWARE , WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RYAN et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv06823
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. RYAN and ANTHONY J. RYAN
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , MERRIMACK MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY , BAY STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Phillips v. Cross et al
as 1:2013cv00948
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillips
Defendant:
Leslie H. Cross, Mortimer Berkowitz, III, John H. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
IN RE: ELLIS A.LEE
as 2:2012cv02695
Respondent:
ELLIS A. LEE and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WILLIAM H. RYAN SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NATHANIEL v. RYAN et al
as 2:2011cv03798
Petitioner:
PEATH O'GRADY NATHANIEL
Respondent:
WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BORCHERT v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00741
Petitioner:
JAMES RAYMOND BORCHERT
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUTLER COUNTY and WILLIAM H. RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAY v. YAVIL et al
as 2:2011cv02518
Plaintiff:
T. BARRY GRAY
Defendant:
DAVID A. YAVIL, WALTER H. SWAYZE, SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATHANIEL v. RYAN
as 2:2011cv02346
Petitioner:
PEATH O'GRADY NATHANIEL
Respondent:
WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARCHUK v. LOWE et al
as 2:2011cv02304
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR MARCHUK
Respondent:
CHAD A. LOWE, WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR. and RISA VETRI FERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
