Cases 1 - 10 of 55
City of Roanoke, Virginia et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
City of Roanoke, Virginia and Roanoke City School Board
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GREENE v. CAMDEN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
AYANNA GREENE
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Courtney Webb v. Clairton City School District
as 22-2125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
