Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Kenneth Hinton v. Paul DeWolfe
as 20-7047
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDITH B. JONES, JOSEPH P. ATKINS and PAUL B. DEWOLFE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HINTON
David Atkins v. Lieutenant Glaser T
as 20-6442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT GLASER T, Team Commander, R. CLEEK, Officer and others
Defendant:
NURSE SAMBOYZ, Head Nurse, RN and JOSEPH P. BARON, Sheriff
Kenneth Hinton v. Joseph Atkins, III
as 19-7903
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN DAVID SHEFFERMAN and JOSEPH PRESTON ATKINS, III
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HINTON
Cynthia Scott v. Harold Clarke
as 19-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA ATKINS, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CYNTHIA SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and TONI HARTLOVE, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
KAREN CHANITA POWELL, LUCETIA ROBINSON, BOBINETTE D. FEARCE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL TARGONSKI, in his official capacity as Medical Director for the Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, ERIC ALDRIDGE and others
Cynthia Scott v. Harold Clarke
as 19-1687
Plaintiff:
MARGUERITE RICHARDS, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, REBECCA L. SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, PATRICIA B. KNIGHT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC ALDRIDGE, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, PAUL OHAI, a/k/a John/Jane Doe, M.D., Medical Director, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, DR. M. MILITANA, Medical Director, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TONI HARTLOVE, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MELISSA ATKINS, CYNTHIA SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Jonathan McGlothian v. W. Fralin
as 19-1333
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHARINE W. WEBB, in their official capacities as members of the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, WILLIAM MURRAY, in their official capacities as members of the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, ROSA ATKINS, in their official capacities as members of the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY MCGLOTHIAN, MT. OLIVET GROUP, LLC and JONATHAN MCGLOTHIAN
Marcus Atkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 19-6433
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS ATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
David Atkins, Jr. v. Lieutenant Glaser T
as 19-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT GLASER T, Team Commander, JOSEPH P. BARON, Sheriff and others
Joseph Pirela v. Jeff Atkin
as 18-1025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF ATKIN, Clerk of Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 177-M53 Appeal, ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, The Congress of the United States of America and others
US v. Omelio Atkin
as 17-4586
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMELIO ATKINS, a/k/a OJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
