Cases 31 - 40 of 615
Leebcor Services, LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 23-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEEBCOR SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, USA, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, in her official capacity, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 23-6751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
G. KELLETT, G.E.O. Inc Unit Manager/Intelligence OFC., PAUL HAYMES, Chief of Special Investigations Unit, DIRECTOR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections and others
Solomon Butler v. Claire Hill
as 23-6675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLOMON NIMROD BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAIRE V. HILL
Latoya Benton v. Seth Layton
as 23-1680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATOYA K. BENTON, Administrator of the Estate of Xzavier D. Hill, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
SETH W. LAYTON, Individually and in his official capacity as a State Trooper for the Virginia State Police and BENJAMIN I. BONE, Individually and in his official capacity as a State Trooper for the Virginia State Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Marcus Hill
as 23-6446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS THEODORE HILL
Lian Ross v. VDOC
as 23-6379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIAN JOHNNY ROSS, a/k/a Lion J. Ross
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. DAYNA HAYNES, Clinical Director, MR. U. M. KILLBOURNE, Unit Manager A Building at River North and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
