Cases 31 - 40 of 47
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving
as 12-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V. and MARC SMET
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Amicus Curiae:
TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Leslie Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 12-1016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE A. HAYMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NA, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICER LP, d/b/a Bank of America, NA, BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS and others
John Cook, III v. Raymond Howard
as 11-1601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN COOK, III, Individually, and as Adminstrator for the Estate of John Gideon Cook, IV, PATRICIA COOK, LINDA HAMMOND, parent and Guardian Ad Litem for Minor J.A.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND A. HOWARD, P/O (ID#C646) and DWAYNE GREEN, P/O (ID#G716)
Defendant:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BALTIMORE, FREDERICK H. BEALEFELD, Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Jeanie Gonzalez v. Beneficial Mortgage Company
as 11-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEANIE GONZALEZ
Plaintiff:
MARCUS GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, a Business Entity, form unknown and HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION, d/b/a Beneficial Mortgage Company of Virginia
Defendant:
INTEGRATED REAL ESTATE PROCESSING, a Business Entity, form unknown, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, a Business Entity, form unknown and DOES 1-100, inclusive
Asad Niyaz v. Bank of America
as 11-1101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASAD SAMMI NIYAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOANS, INCORPORATED, America's Wholesale Lender, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and others
David Allen v. Wachovia Corporation
as 10-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. ALLEN, ROBERT M. COMINSKY, ROSE HANSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA PEGUES, individually and on behalf of the Wachovia Savings Plan and all others similarly situated, SHARON CREEL, individually and on behalf of the Wachovia Savings Plan and all others similarly situated, ALAN A. HARDMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WACHOVIA CORPORATION, WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JOHN D. BAKER, II and others
Mohammed Aziz v. Alcolac, Incorporated
as 10-1908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AZIZ, MERAN SALIH ABDULLAH, MOSSA ABDULLAH MOSSA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCOLAC, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF IRAQ, a sovereign nation, VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a/k/a VWR International LTD, f/k/a BDH, LTD, THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Oxoid, LTD, a/k/a Oxoid, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Shanis v. Putnam Investments Trust
as 09-1792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH SHANIS and LEAD PLAINTIFF OHIO TUITION TRUST AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
DIANE SAUNDERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, THOMAS W. FORSTER, THE CITY OF SUNRISE GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PUTNAM INVESTMENTS TRUST, PUTNAM INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, JAMES PRUSKO and others
Defendant - None:
PUTNAM FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY, PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INCORPORATED, LINCOLN FINANCIAL ADVISORS CORPORATION and others
Movant - None:
JILL LYNN BAILIN, PUTNAM FUNDS, JOANNE S. BASEMAN and others
Edward Gardner, IV v. Michael Easley
as 09-6256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD J. GARDNER, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, BEVERLY PERDUE, JOHN AND JANE DOES, NC Senators 1-500 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
