Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,251
Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
as 24-6594
Defendant: COUNTY OF YORK, RHPD JOHN DOE #3, ROCK HIL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff: LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
US v. John Johnson
as 24-6586
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN HENRY JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1549
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. John Williams, III
as 24-4314
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN ROBERT WILLIAMS, III
Laquita Oliver v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-188
Petitioner: LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Respondent: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Presidential Candidate v. John Roberts
as 24-1537
Plaintiff: PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, d/b/a United Emrits of America, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897
Defendant: CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., JUSTICE NEIL M. GORSUCH, CLERK OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and others
US v. John Lee
as 24-6565
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN ALLEN LEE
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-2, Correctional Officers, REEP, Warden, HUDGINS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff: ALBERT ANDERSON
Timothy Payne v. U.S. Army Material Command (AMC)
as 24-1521
Defendant: AMC/IMCOM DIRECTOR, JOYCE BALDWIN, AMC/IMCOM (retired services), U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND (AMC), f/k/a Installation Management Command (IMCOM) and others
Plaintiff: SSGT. TIMOTHY ADAM PAYNE
William Gooch v. John Hickenlooper
as 24-1509
Defendant: JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Senator of Colorado, PHIL WEISER, Colorado Attorney General, JUDGE GREGORY WERNER, 4th Judicial District Court, El Paso County and others
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ANTHONEY GOOCH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?