Cases 31 - 40 of 5,955
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1077
Not Yet Classified:
In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
DEFENDANTS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FOAM, INCORPORATED and others
Appellant:
TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, TOWN OF HARRIETSTOWN, NEW YORK and TOWN OF ISLIP, NEW YORK
Bank of America Corporation v. US
as 23-2319
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, f/k/a NationsBank, f/k/a BankAmerica Corporation, f/k/a FleetBoston Financial Corporation, f/k/a BankBoston Corporation, f/k/a Summit Bancorp, f/k/a MBNA Corporation, f/k/a Merrill Lynch & Company, Incorporated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peter Gakuba v. April
as 23-2303
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
APRIL, Customer Service, USPS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Penny Barnett v. US
as 23-2221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PENNY JO BARNETT, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Edward Barnett
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Washington Windsor v. US
as 23-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASHINGTON WINDSOR, and his dependents
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Evy Orellana v. Deputy United States Marshal Ryan Godec
as 23-2224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EVY B. ORELLANA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL RYAN GODEC, in his individual capacity and DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL TRISTAN MARTIN, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE U.S. MARSHALS 1-2, in their individual capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Andrew Straw v. US
as 23-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW U. D. STRAW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
