Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 770
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant: ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent: CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee: CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver: MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Michael Scott v. Baltimore County, Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1731
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. SCOTT, RUDOLPH ARMSTRONG, AARON KESSLER and others
Defendant / Appellee: BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
US v. Donald Martin, Jr.
as 23-4424
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DONALD MARTIN, JR., a/k/a Duke
US v. Brandi Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6581
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: BRANDI MARTIN
Ka'lah Martin v. Travis Short
as 23-1588
Plaintiff / Appellee: KA'LAH MARTIN, a/k/a Kalah Martin
Defendant / Appellant: TRAVIS SHORT, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, KYLE GABBY, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department and JEREMIAH HARRELSON, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department
Defendant: GREGORY SEABOLT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, STEVEN W. MYERS, both individually and in his official capacity as internal Affairs Deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department, EDWARD SLAFKY, both individually and in his official capacity as deputy with the Randolph County Sheriff's Department and others
Kevin Pitts v. State of South Carolina
as 23-6532
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN PITTS
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ANDERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MINDY HERVEY, Solicitor individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1546
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6499
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III
Defendant / Appellee: MARY LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1500
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Martin v. Susan Duffy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6445
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY FRED MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee: SUSAN DUFFY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?