Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Michael Derrow v. Kenny Atkin
as 14-7694
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOSEPH DERROW
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNY ATKINS
David Atkins v. Bobbie Joe
as 14-6328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBIE JOE, Head Nurse, MR. CARTER, doctor and ROBERT MCCABE, Sheriff
Luana Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 13-2062
:
In re: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED, WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUANA SCOTT, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
TANYA LAKITSHA WARREN, a/k/a Tanya Warren-Thomas, CLAIR W. TROST, SR., KHIALLAH SOLOMON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED
Mark Corrigan v. Ms. Atkin
as 13-7183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK R. CORRIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. ATKINS, MS. BOLLOT, DOCTOR CERVI and others
John the Methodist as Rev. v. The State of North Carolina
as 13-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN THE METHODIST AS REV. JOHN LEE MORRIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Thomas Switzer v. John Thoma
as 13-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. SWITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff, GORDON CROSEN, Deputy, MIKE ATKINS, Deputy Captain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Emilio Bautista-Serrano v. Mr. Clark
as 12-7566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMILIO BAUTISTA-SERRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. CLARK
Defendant:
KENNEY ATKINS, Warden
David Atkins v. Donald Farley
as 12-7510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD F. FARLEY, Sheriff, K. SEARS, Classification Officer, SHANK, Classification Officer and others
US v. Ronald Atkin
as 12-4208
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD ATKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
