Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Henderson Hinton v. Roy Cooper
as 12-6000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENDERSON L. HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY COOPER, ROBIN PENDERGRAFT, PAT J. MATTHEWS and others
US v. Tyrone Hinton
as 11-5108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TYRONE ERNELL HINTON
Charles Hinton v. Michael Henderson
as 11-7339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. HENDERSON, TERESA BROADWAY and ANDREW RUDGERS, Probation Officer
Defendant:
PETER S. GILCHRIST, III and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7038
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kwan Hinton v. Townsend
as 11-7018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWAN HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden, D. SAUNDERS, Hearing Officer, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Warden and others
Defendant:
HARRIS L. DIGGS, JR., Chief Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center and CLARY, Major, Chief Security Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center
Charles Hinton v. Linda Lopez
as 11-6918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA LOPEZ, ANDREW MURRAY, CHRISTIAN HOEL and others
Kenn Hinton v. Providence Dane, LLC
as 11-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENN HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDENCE DANE LLC
Charles Hinton v. Andrew Murray
as 11-6596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW MURRAY, CHRISTIAN HOEL, WILLIAM BELL and others
Timothy Finley v. Oshun Hinton
as 11-1431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY E. FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. CONROY, Narcotics Detective, in his individual and official capacity, BOBBY CARIAS, Narcotics Detective, in his individual and official capacity, DAVE M. HENDERSON, Captain, in his individual and official capacity and others
US v. Kurt Hinton
as 11-4431
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KURT JOSEPH HINTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
