Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 566
Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El
as 24-1457
Plaintiff: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT CENTRAL VIRGINIA DISTRICT OFFICE, ARTHUR MISKIMON and SADE BATTLE
Defendant: NASIEM AHMAD SHABAZZ EL
Kanautica Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 24-6477
Plaintiff: KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, GARY JUNKER, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction and others
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff: KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant: GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Joe Teague, Jr. v. Arthur Gepner
as 24-1393
Plaintiff: JOE EDWARDS TEAGUE, JR.
Defendant: ARTHUR L. GEPNER, for Cherokee Federal d/b/a CN3S, BOBBY DETTMER, Flux Resources LLC, CLINT BUCKLEY, Flux Resources LLC and others
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff: NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
In re: Arthur Jones
as 24-1351
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
In re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-149
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
In re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-131
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
In re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-132
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?