Cases 1 - 10 of 272
Rodney Cobbs v. Ben David
as 24-6571
Plaintiff:
RODNEY E. COBBS
Defendant:
BEN DAVID and CONNIE JORDAN
US v. Johnny Jordan
as 24-6560
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHNNY EARL JORDAN, a/k/a June June
John Berman v. Rich Jordan
as 24-1497
Plaintiff:
JOHN BERMAN
Defendant:
RICHARD JORDAN, in his official capacity as Senior Judge, JEANNIE EUN KYUNG CHO, in her official capacity as Judge, CYNTHIA CALLAHAN, in her official capacity as Senior Judge and others
Brandon Crosby v. Larry Collins
as 24-6441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LUIS CROSBY
Defendant:
LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager of C-Building, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Correctional Operations for Virginia Department of Corrections, RANDALL MATHENA, Director of Security and Correction Enforcement for Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Jay Folse v. American Electric Power Service Corporation
as 24-1284
Plaintiff:
JAY FOLSE
Defendant:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION, APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, PHILLIPS & JORDAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC and others
Lynne Kritter v. Brent Mooring
as 24-1158
Plaintiff:
LYNNE E. KRITTER, as Executor of the Estate of Eugene John Kritter, III and KRITTER CROPDUSTING, INC.
Defendant:
BRENT MOORING, as Administrator CTA of the Estate of Murry Rayborn Daw, DAW FARMS, INC., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Shailesh Jahagirdar v. Computer Haus NC, Inc.
as 24-1046
Plaintiff:
SHAILESH JAHAGIRDAR, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ALLEN ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JORDAN BLAIS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
THE COMPUTER HAUS NC, INC, d/b/a CityMac, a North Carolina Corporation, TROY CURRAN, an individual, ZEPHYR INVESTMENTS, INC., a Washington Corporation and others
US v. Adam Jordan, III
as 23-7292
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM JOE LOUIS JORDAN, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
