Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
William Peterson, III v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC
as 23-2316
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PETERSON, III
Defendant:
HARRAH'S NC CASINO COMPANY, LLC and CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
US v. Leonus Peterson
as 23-7264
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEONUS STEVENSON PETERSON, a/k/a Doe, a/k/a Doughboy
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
US v. Shannon Peterson
as 23-4188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHANNON SHAMOR PETERSON
US v. Steven Peterson
as 23-4023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN ANTONIO PETERSON
Robert Horowitz v. Mr. Rosales
as 22-2301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOROWITZ, CATHY HOROWITZ and ELIZABETH HOROWITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. ROSALES, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County
Defendant:
BRUCE SHERMAN, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County, YORGOS BALARAS, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County, ROBIN LEWIS, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County and others
Dave Thomas v. Warden T. Jarrell
as 22-7309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN T. JARRELL, Warden / Building Security, CAPTAIN B. CLAUDE, A. ANDERSON, Head Food Supervisor S-1 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Glendora Manago v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP
as 22-2044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENDORA MANAGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KAREN PETERSON, SHARON DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CANE BAY PARTNERS VI, LLLP, DAVID JOHNSON, KIRK CHEWNING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
