Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El
as 24-1457
Plaintiff:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT CENTRAL VIRGINIA DISTRICT OFFICE, ARTHUR MISKIMON and SADE BATTLE
Defendant:
NASIEM AHMAD SHABAZZ EL
Muna al-Suyid v. Khalifa Hifter
as 24-1429
Plaintiff:
MUNA AL-SUYID, individually and on behalf of the estates of her family members Abdel Salam al-Suyid, Ibrahim al-Suyid, Khalid al-Suyid and Mustafa al-Suyid, ABDALLA AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny, AHMAD AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny and others
Defendant:
KHALIFA HIFTER, SADDAM HIFTER and KHALID HIFTER
Muna al-Suyid v. Khalifa Hifter
as 24-1422
Plaintiff:
MUNA AL-SUYID, individually and on behalf of the estates of her family members Abdel Salam al-Suyid, Ibrahim al-Suyid, Khalid al-Suyid and Mustafa al-Suyid, ABDALLA AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny, AHMAD AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny and others
Defendant:
KHALIFA HIFTER, KHALID HIFTER and SADDAM HIFTER
US v. Ramel Harris
as 23-4336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMEL AHMAD HARRIS
US v. Ahmad Hashimi
as 22-7190
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AHMAD SAYED HASHIMI, a/k/a Jimmy, a/k/a Jimmy Jimski, a/k/a Jamshaid
Ahmad Smith v. Franklin Correctional Center
as 22-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD SHAAKIM SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Syed Ahmad v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2234
Petitioner:
SYED ZAFAR AHMAD
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Douglas Geter
as 21-6345
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS AHMAD GETER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
