Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Brooke Somers v. Anthony Devine
as 24-1511
Plaintiff:
BROOKE N. SOMERS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEVINE, TOWN OF ELKTON, MARYLAND, JOHN ROUSH and others
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Deafueh Monbo v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.
as 24-1292
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., HARFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
Deafueh Monbo v. Harford County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1092
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ROBERT CAMPBELL, in his official capacity as an employee of Harford County Sheriff Office, UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
James Cecil, Jr. v. John Bowman
as 23-6654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BOWMAN and KEVIN JONES
James Cecil, Jr. v. Dr. Large
as 23-6448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. LARGE
George McDermott v. Alan McCarthy
as 22-1642
Plaintiff:
VINCENT S. SAMMONS
Intervenor:
GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN J. MCCARTHY, ALFRED C. WEIN, JR., JENNIFER R. LYALL and others
Cecil Truman v. P. A. White
as 22-6564
Petitioner / Appellant:
CECIL GUY TRUMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
P. A. WHITE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
