Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Malachi Bolds v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health
as 21-1419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALACHI BOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIE LANDRUM, individually and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
Alphonso Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Solution
as 19-6150
Defendant / Appellee:
C. KUNKLE, NFN ANDERSON, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, SvpTp and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH
Alphonso Haynesworth v. SC Dept of Mental Health
as 18-6295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, SVPTP, KIMBERLY POHOLCHUK, CYNTHIA HELFF and others
James Muhammad v. Correct Care Solution
as 16-6457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUHAMMAD, Ahmad Muhammad-Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH and CLIENT ISAIAH HEMPHILL, and Family
Ahmad Muhammad-Ali v. Ku Kluxs Klans
as 15-7596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD MUHAMMAD-ALI, a/k/a James Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
KU KLUX KLAN, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, AIKEN COUNTY and others
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-244
Petitioner:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Respondent:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
