Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Dianne Maros v. Ashley Cure
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
DIANNE M. MAROS
Defendant:
ASHLEY ELIZABETH CURE, GREENVILLE COUNTY and GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 23-6794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER, a/k/a Larry James Tyler, #354459
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Gwendolyn Dianne Wilkes v. State of North Carolina
as 23-1684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNDER SEAL 1, UNDER SEAL 2, GWENDOLYN DIANNE WILKES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNDER SEAL 3 and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 23-6374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 22-7437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Medical Mutual Ins. Co. of North Carolina v. Cathy Gnik
as 22-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEDICAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant / Appellant:
CATHY GINK, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of N.A., A Minor and N.L. A Minor, COURTNEY ANDREW-KNIGHT, TRISTEN ANDREW-MAJOR and others
Defendant:
JONI J. JOHNSON, , M.D., PEDIATRIC PARTNERS FOR ATTENTION AND LEARNING, INC., VERNON GREEN, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dianne Nickles v. Tabitha Gwynn
as 22-1649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANNE G. NICKLES
Defendant / Appellee:
TABITHA BONITA GWYNN
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
