Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,284
Rani Allan v. Daniel Gigi
as 24-1359
Plaintiff: RANI ALLAN
Defendant: DANIEL NATHAN GIGI, SHLOMO GIGI, ARLINGTON COUNTY and others
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1352
Plaintiff: JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant: DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1346
Plaintiff: JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant: DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
US v. Luis Barrera
as 24-6308
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LUIS CENOBIO BARRERA, a/k/a Daniel Munguia Casanova, a/k/a Felipe Molina Garcia
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff: KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant: JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff: CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant: MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
In re: Daniel Wade, Jr.
as 24-115
Petitioner: In re: DANIEL LEE WADE, JR.
Michael Leslie v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6160
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANTHONY LESLIE
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and DANIEL P. O'BRIEN, Special Deputy Attorney General
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff: DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
US v. Dominique Daniels
as 24-6106
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DOMINIQUE MALIK DANIELS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?