Cases 1 - 10 of 2,793
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Robert English
as 24-4284
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT EDGAR ENGLISH, a/k/a H. B., a/k/a Hot Boy, a/k/a Head Buster
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Saadiq Long v. William Barr
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capactiy only and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director Department of Corrections
as 24-6341
Petitioner:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 24-6336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
