Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Dea'Shawn Harrison v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6242
Plaintiff:
DEA'SHAWN HARRISON
Defendant:
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina and THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Marqueion Harrison v. Warden Bullard
as 24-6128
Plaintiff:
MARQUEION HARRISON
Defendant:
WARDEN BULLARD, STEPHEN JACOBS, SERGEANT LEGGETT and others
Open Justice Baltimore v. Baltimore City Law Department
as 23-2293
Plaintiff:
OPEN JUSTICE BALTIMORE, ALISSA FIGUEROA and BRANDON SODERBERG
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, JAMES SHEA, In his official capacity as City Solicitor, STEPHEN SALSBURY, In his official capacity as Chief of Staff to the City Solicitor and others
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
US v. Ayodele Arasokun
as 23-4613
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AYODELE HARRISON ARASOKUN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Harrison Lewis, III
as 23-6460
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Marqueion Harrison v. Mr. Jacobs
as 23-6376
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARQUEION HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
