Cases 1 - 10 of 15
J. Phillips v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. DWAYNE PHILLIPS, MARK EHRLICH, RYAN MESZAROS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RECTORS AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, WHITTINGTON WHITESIDE CLEMENT, in his official capacity as Rector of the University of Virginia, ROBERT D. HARDIE, in his official capacity as Vice Rector of the University of Virginia and others
Defendant:
MARY FRANCES SOUTHERLAND, Chief Administrative Officer UVA Health, in her individual capacity, JOHN DOES 1-5, Senior Human Resources personnel of UVA Health, in their individual capacities, JOHN DOES 1-14, Senior Human Resources personnel of UVA Health, in their individual and official capacities and others
Marcus Thorpe v. Derrick Copeland
as 23-6333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS A. THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
DERRICK COPELAND, f/k/a John Does 1-5, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, f/k/a John Does 1-5 and others
Defendant:
ANITA GOWANS, f/k/a A. Gowans, Nurse, Alexander CI, JOHN DOES, Correctional Officers 1-5, JOHN DOE, Medical Doctor and others
Barbara Sopkin v. Jill Mendelson
as 22-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA SOPKIN, Citizen of Israel in Her Capacity as Assignee of Lucre Investments Ltd, General Partner of Interlase Limited Partnership, a Georgia Limited Partnership, and in a Derivative Action for Interlase Limited Partnership
Defendant / Appellee:
JILL C. MENDELSON, Executor of Estate of Richard S. Mendelson, Deceased, RICHARD S. MENDELSON TRUST, H. Carter Land III, Trustee, LAND, CARROLL & BLAIR, P.C., f/k/a Land Clark Carroll Mendelson Blair P.C. and others
Defendant:
JOHN WILLIAM TOOTHMAN, Attorney, MADELINE A. TRAINOR, Attorney, JOHN DOES 1-5, Trustees of Richard S. Mendelson Trust and others
Career Counseling, Inc. v. Amerifactors Financial Group, LLC
as 22-1136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAREER COUNSELING, INC., d/b/a Snelling Staffing Services, a South Carolina corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERIFACTORS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5
Career Counseling, Inc. v. Amerifactors Financial Group, LLC
as 22-1119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREER COUNSELING, INC., d/b/a Snelling Staffing Services, a South Carolina corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERIFACTORS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Jason Vicks v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 17-1786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON VICKS and MEKEISHA VICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Barbara Sopkin v. Jill Mendelson
as 17-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA SOPKIN, Citizen of Israel in Her Capacity as Assignee of Lucre Investments Ltd, General Partner of Interlase Limited Partnership, a Georgia Limited Partnership, and in a Derivative Action for Interlase Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellee:
JILL C. MENDELSON, Executor of Estate of Richard S. Mendelson, Deceased, RICHARD S. MENDELSON TRUST, H. Carter Land III, Trustee, LAND CLARK CARROLL BLAIR, P.C., f/k/a Land Clark Carroll Mendelson Blair P.C. and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, Trustees of Richard S. Mendelson Trust
Jason Vicks v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 16-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON VICKS and MEKEISHA VICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1-5 and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
William Wallace v. Patricia Poulo
as 12-1607
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM E. WALLACE, individually and on behalf of his minor child and G. R. W., minor child
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. POULOS, a/k/a Patricia H. Poulos, SHON BARR, KEVIN BURNS and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5
William Wallace v. Patricia Poulo
as 12-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. WALLACE, on behalf of his minor child and G. R. W., Minor Child
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA A. POULOS, a/k/a Patricia H. Poulos, SHON BARR, KEVIN BURNS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
