Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Toby Mackall v. US Department Of Defense
as 17-2435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBY ROBERTO MACKALL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CLARK W. LEMASTERS, JR., Major General, U.S. Army, TACOM Commanding General, TIMOTHY D. LUEDECKING, Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Assistant, OUSD ATL and others
Bennie Mack, Jr. v. Officer Charles Turner
as 17-6337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE A. MACK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER CHARLES TURNER, in his official capacity as an employee of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and in his individual capacity, TRAVIS ELMORE, in his official capacity as an employee of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and in his individual capacity, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and in his individual capacity and others
US v. Jimmie Wade Lemaster, Jr.
as 12-4183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMIE WADE LEMASTER, JR.
US v. Jimmie Lemaster, Jr.
as 12-4151
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMIE WADE LEMASTER, JR.
US v. Jimmie Wade Lemaster, Jr.
as 12-4150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMIE WADE LEMASTER, JR.
Charles Lemaster v. DOWCP
as 09-1749
Petitioner:
CHARLES LEMASTER, Deceased; Betty E. Lemaster, widow
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Equifax Information Services, v. William Harris, Sr.
as 08-192
Petitioner:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Respondent:
WILLIAM A. HARRIS, SR., AVIS B. GRIFFITH, JEFFREY D. GRIFFITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
