Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jamel Lunsford v. Warden Jacob
as 23-7075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JACOB, WARDEN LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner of Prison/Director and others
Jamel Lunsford v. North Carolina Department of Corrections
as 23-6611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
US v. Jamel Lunsford
as 23-4379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD, a/k/a Action, a/k/a Beaver
Roger Lunsford v. DOJ
as 23-6056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, for the Middle District of North Carolina and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Charlotte, North Carolina and Greensboro, North Carolina Field Offices
Sherrie Porter v. First Bankshares, Inc.
as 22-1685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERRIE N. PORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST BANKSHARES, INC., PHILLIP VALLANDINGHAM, P. ANDREW VALLANDINGHAM and others
Defendant:
FIRST STATE BANK OF BARBOURSVILLE, FIRST COMPANY and WEST VIRGINIA DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND, INC.
US v. Roger Lunsford
as 22-6079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
US v. Roger Lunsford
as 21-7044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
US v. Roger Lunsford
as 20-6596
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Keith Donaldo Lunsford v. Harold W. Clarke
as 18-6190
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH DONALDO LUNSFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the D.O.C.
Mark Weiner v. Albemarle County, Virginia
as 18-1210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK L. WEINER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT TRACCI, in his official capacity as Albemarle County Commonwealth's Attorney
Defendant:
DENISE Y. LUNSFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOES, Nos. 1-10 and ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
